Condensation in Dust-enriched Systems, by D.S. Ebel and L. Grossman,
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999

Results: Vapor of Solar Composition

Different thermodynamic data are employed for some crystalline phases, many more chemical species are included and a very different computational procedure was used in the present study than in our previous work on condensation (Yoneda and Grossman, 1995). It is therefore important to compare results from the two studies, and this is done for the case of a solar gas at Ptot = 10-3 bar in Table 6. Appearance temperatures of phases refer to the highest temperature step at which a phase is part of the condensate assemblage in the 2K steps of the calculations. Our results are quite similar, but not identical, to those of Yoneda and Grossman (1995), referred to as the previous work in the following explanation of the differences which, in all cases, are due to differences in thermodynamic data. Note that, although some of the data used in our previous work may be more accurate, e.g. those for hibonite and grossite, we use those in Table 3 in the present study because the latter are more consistent with the MELTS liquid model. Hibonite forms from corundum 15K lower in the present calculations than in the previous work because hibonite is 2.5 kJ less stable and corundum 0.3 kJ more stable at 1700K in the present work. The lesser stability of hibonite in the present work allows it to be replaced by grossite and CaAl2O4, which are 16.7 and 8.7 kJ more stable, respectively, at 1700K in the present work. The gehlenite end-member of the melilite solid solution series is here 10.1 kJ less stable at 1600K than previously, and it forms from CaAl2O4, a phase more stable than hibonite in the present calculations. This causes the appearance temperature of melilite to be suppressed by nearly 50K and allows grossite and hibonite to partially replace it at lower temperature. Spinel condenses 13K lower in the present work than previously, primarily because the MgAl2O4 end-member is now 3.5 kJ less stable at 1500K. Plagioclase forms from spinel ~10K lower in the present work because the CaAl2Si2O8 end-member is 6.5 kJ less stable at 1400K than previously. In the present work, Ti3O5 forms from Ti-bearing clinopyroxene 18K lower and Ti4O7 does not form at all because of gross differences in the way the Ti-bearing end-member components are treated in the two calculations. In the previous work, literature data were used for the Ti3+-bearing component, CaTiAlSiO6, and estimated for the Ti4+-bearing component, CaTiAl2O6, while, in the present work, only data for the Ti4+-bearing components, CaTi0.5Mg0.5AlSiO6 and CaTi0.5Mg0.5FeSiO6, are used. Cordierite replaces plagioclase in the present work because it is 12.8 kJ/mole more stable, and plagioclase is 7.2 kJ less stable, at 1300K relative to the previous work. Sphene does not form above 1200K in the present work because it is 5.5 kJ/mole less stable than previously. No liquids were found to be stable in solar gas at Ptot=10-3 bar by us or any previous workers, e.g. Wagner (1979), Wood and Hashimoto (1993) and Yoneda and Grossman (1995), despite a contrary claim by Wark (1987).

Table 6. Temperatures (K) of appearance and disappearance of condensates from a gas of solar composition at Ptot=10-3 bar, compared with earlier results.
 

This work

Yoneda and Grossman (1995)

Mineral

In

Out

In

Out

Corundum

1770

1726

1770

1740

Hibonite

1728

1686

1743

1500

Grossite

1698

1594

   

Perovskite

1680

1458

1688

1448

CaAl2O4

1624

1568

   

Melilite ss.

1580

1434

1628

1444

Grossite

1568

1502

   

Hibonite

1502

1488

   

Spinel ss.

1488

1400

1501

1409

Metal ss.

1462

 

1464

 

Clinopyroxene ss.

1458

 

1449

 

Olivine ss.

1444

 

1443

 

Plagioclase ss.

1406

1318

1416

 

Ti3O5

1368

1342

1386

1361

Orthopyroxene ss.

1366

 

1366

 

Ti4O7

   

1361

1217

Cordierite

1330

     

Cr-spinel ss.

1230

 

1221

 

Sphene

   

1217

 

End of Computation

1200

 

970

 



CONDENSATION
in
DUST-ENRICHED SYSTEMS


Denton S. Ebel (1)

Lawrence Grossman(1,2)

(1) Department of The Geophysical Sciences
The University of Chicago
5734 South Ellis Ave.
Chicago, IL 60637

(2) Enrico Fermi Institute
The University of Chicago
5640 South Ellis Ave.
Chicago, IL 60637

Submitted December 22, 1998 to

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Revised version submitted June 30, 1999
Abstract Introduction
Technique

Bulk Composition
Method of Calculation
Data for Elements and Gas Species
Data and Models for Solids
Data and Models for Silicate Liquids
Test of MELTS: Peridotite KLB-1
Transition Between Liquid Models
Results

Vapor of Solar Composition
General Effects of Dust Enrichment and Total Pressure
Oxygen Fugacity
Condensation Temperatures and Liquid Stability
Condensation at 100x Dust Enrichment, Ptot=10-3bar
Condensation at 1000x Dust Enrichment, Ptot=10-3bar
Condensation of Oxidized Iron at High Temperature
Bulk Chemical Composition of Condensates
Composition of Silicate Liquid
Composition of Spinel
Composition of Clinopyroxene
Composition of Feldspar
Composition of Metallic Nickel-Iron
Metal-Sulfide Condensate Assemblages
Discussion

Stability of Silicate Liquid in Solar Gas
Chondrules in Dust-enriched Systems
Conclusions References