Condensation in Dust-enriched Systems, by D.S. Ebel and L. Grossman,
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999

Technique: Transition Between Liquid Models

A decision must be made as to when to switch from one model to the other. In order to model non-CMAS oxides in the liquid, it would be best to switch to the MELTS model at the highest feasible temperature.
CMAS vs MELTS 100p3(thumbnail)

-------------------

Figure 3: Compositions of CMAS and MELTS liquids near the olivine appearance temperature (vertical line at 1782 K) at the stated conditions. In this temperature range, the MELTS liquid also contains ~1 wt% of other oxides, which are not shown. (enlarge)
For the case of 100x dust enrichment at Ptot=10-3 bar, the curves in Fig. 3 illustrate the major oxide compositions of the two liquids, calculated at 2K intervals, near the appearance temperature of olivine, indicated by the vertical line at 1782K. The CMAS liquid is CaO- and Al2O3-rich at high temperatures, but SiO2 and MgO increase rapidly with decreasing temperature. By contrast, although a MELTS liquid becomes stable well above 1782K, it is CaO-deficient and SiO2-enriched, relative to the CMAS liquid, because the only liquid the MELTS model can determine to be stable must have sufficient SiO2 to supply the required CaSiO3 component. That is, in the temperature range above at least 1790K, the most stable liquid possible in the MELTS composition range is not the liquid which should be stable. When the temperature of olivine appearance is reached, however, the MELTS liquid has gained sufficient SiO2 and MgO to have a composition very similar to the CMAS liquid at the same temperature. Once sufficient SiO2 has condensed, the MELTS model closely tracks the Berman (1983) model liquid, but also accounts for increasing FeO and TiO2 contents.



CONDENSATION
in
DUST-ENRICHED SYSTEMS


Denton S. Ebel (1)

Lawrence Grossman(1,2)

(1) Department of The Geophysical Sciences
The University of Chicago
5734 South Ellis Ave.
Chicago, IL 60637

(2) Enrico Fermi Institute
The University of Chicago
5640 South Ellis Ave.
Chicago, IL 60637

Submitted December 22, 1998 to

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Revised version submitted June 30, 1999
Abstract Introduction
Technique

Bulk Composition
Method of Calculation
Data for Elements and Gas Species
Data and Models for Solids
Data and Models for Silicate Liquids
Test of MELTS: Peridotite KLB-1
Transition Between Liquid Models
Results

Vapor of Solar Composition
General Effects of Dust Enrichment and Total Pressure
Oxygen Fugacity
Condensation Temperatures and Liquid Stability
Condensation at 100x Dust Enrichment, Ptot=10-3bar
Condensation at 1000x Dust Enrichment, Ptot=10-3bar
Condensation of Oxidized Iron at High Temperature
Bulk Chemical Composition of Condensates
Composition of Silicate Liquid
Composition of Spinel
Composition of Clinopyroxene
Composition of Feldspar
Composition of Metallic Nickel-Iron
Metal-Sulfide Condensate Assemblages
Discussion

Stability of Silicate Liquid in Solar Gas
Chondrules in Dust-enriched Systems
Conclusions References