Pseudophilautus Laurent, 1943
Pseudophilautus Laurent, 1943, Bull. Mus. R. Hist. Nat. Belg., 19: 2. Type species: Ixalus temporalis Günther, 1864, by original designation.
Kirtixalus Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 72. Type species: Polypedates microtympanum Günther, 1858, by original designation. Name proposed as a subgenus of Philautus. Synonymy by Li, Che, Murphy, Zhao, Zhao, Rao, and Zhang, 2009, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 53: 510.
Kirtixalus — Yu, Rao, Zhang, and Yang, 2009, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 50: 578. Recognition at generic rank.
Shrub-frogs (Manamendra-Arachchi and Pethiyagoda, 2005, Raffles Bull. Zool., Suppl., 12: 163 [as Philautus]).
Kirtisinghe's Oriental Shrub Frogs (Bossuyt and Dubois, 2001, Zeylanica, 6: 85).
Sri Lanka, and the Western Ghats of southwestern India.
Pseudophilautus was resurrected from the synonymy of Philautus by Li, Che, Murphy, Zhao, Zhao, Rao, and Zhang, 2009, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 53: 510, where it was placed by Inger IN Frost, 1985, Amph. Species World: 439; Bossuyt and Dubois, 2001, Zeylanica, 6: 6. Biju, Shouche, Dubois, Dutta, and Bossuyt, 2010, Curr. Sci., Bangalore, 98: 1120, restricted the concept of Pseudophilautus to the predominantly Sri Lankan clade, and transferred its putative sister taxon, the monophyletic group of India to southern China and Vietnam, to Raorchestes. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543-583, provided a tree of examplar species as part of their study of Genbank sequences, confirmed the placement of a monophyletic Pseudophilautus as the sister taxon of Raorchestes, but employed an antiquated taxonomy that obscures this result.Wickramasinghe, Vidanapathirana, Rajeev, Ariyarathne, Chanaka, Priyantha, Bandara, and Wickramasinghe, 2013, J. Threatened Taxa, 5: 3789-3920, provided tables of morphological comparisons to distinguish among the species. . Li, Li, Klaus, Rao, Hillis, and Zhang, 2013, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110: 3441–3446, provided a Bayesian tree of molecular evidence that suggests that Pseudophilautus is the sister taxon of Raorchestes + Kurixalus. Given the Kurixalus has free-living larvae and Raorchestes and Pseudophilautus (previously considered to form a monophyletic group) have direct development, this suggests that either direct development in Raorchestes and Pseudophilautus are not homologous, or that free-swimming larvae have redeveloped in Kurixalus (DRF, 21 May 2013).
Contained taxa (79 sp.):
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.