Cophixalus Boettger, 1892
Cophixalus Boettger, 1892, Kat. Batr. Samml. Mus. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges.: 24. Type species: Sphenophryne verrucosa Boulenger, 1898, by subsequent designation of the Opinion 1266, Anonymous, 1984, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 41: 12-14 (see comment).
Rainforest Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 88).
Moluccan Is.; New Guinea; northeastern Queensland, Australia.
Menzies, Tyler, and Zweifel, 1980, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 36: 231-235, showed that the type species (by monotypy) of Cophixalus Boettger, Cophixalus geislerorum, belongs to the genus Oreophryne as these genera currently are understood. In response to the petition of Menzies, Tyler, and Zweifel, 1980, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 36: 231-235, the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature, Opinion 1266, Anonymous, 1984, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 41: 12-14, designated Sphenophryne verrucosa Boulenger, 1898, as the type species of Cophixalus and placed Cophixalus on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology. Australian species taxonomy and literature reviewed by Cogger, Cameron, and Cogger, 1983, Zool. Cat. Aust., Amph. Rept., 1: 52-53. See Zweifel, 1985, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 182: 265-388, for review. Hoskin, 2004, Aust. J. Zool., 52: 237-269, provided a molecular tree of the Australian species as well as revisory comments on several species. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353-365, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that Cophixalus is polyphyletic with (1) Cophixalus sphagnicolus being the sister taxon of Albericus + Choerophryne and (2) Cophixalus balbus being the sister taxon of Barygenys and a group containing at least Cophixalus humicola and Cophixalus tridactylus forming the sister taxon of that inclusive group. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543-583, in their study of Genbank sequences, came to somewhat different results. Hoskin, 2008, Mem. Queensland Mus., 52: 233-237, provided a key to the species of Australia. Kraus, 2010, ZooKeys, 48: 39-59, noted the lack of evidence for monophyly of Cophixalus and discussed this in light of recognition of other nominal genera. de Sá, Streicher, Sekonyela, Forlani, Loader, Greenbaum, Richards, and Haddad, 2012, BMC Evol. Biol., 12(241): 1-21, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that Cophixalus is polyphyletic.
Contained taxa (65 sp.):
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.