Pseudopaludicola falcipes (Hensel, 1867)

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Leptodactylidae > Subfamily: Leiuperinae > Genus: Pseudopaludicola > Species: Pseudopaludicola falcipes

Liuperus falcipes Hensel, 1867, Arch. Naturgesch., 33: 134. Syntype(s): including ZMB 6799 (lot), now renumbered 6799, 70433, 70434, 70435, 70436, 78709, 78710, 78711, 78712, 78713, 78714, and 78715, according to Langone, Lavilla, de Sá, and Cardozo, 2015, Zootaxa, 4058: 145. 

. Type locality: "Provinz S. Pedro do Rio Grande do Sul", Brazil.

Paludicola falcipesBoulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 236.

Pseudopaludicola falcipesMiranda-Ribeiro, 1926, Arq. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, 27: 152; Gallardo, 1964, Neotropica, 10: 25.

English Names

Hensel’s Swamp Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 84).

Distribution

Provinces of Buenos Aires, Corrientes, Entre Rios, Santa Fe, and southern Misiones in Argentina, the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina (possibly into Paraná) in Brazil, and all of Uruguay. 

Comment

See comments under Pseudopaludicola mystacalis and Pseudopaludicola saltica. See account by Cei, 1980, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Monogr., 2: 410-412. Klappenbach and Langone, 1992, An. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Montevideo, Ser. 2, 8: 199, noted that geographic variation in karyotype suggests that this nominal taxon contains more than one species. Lobo, 1994, Cuad. Herpetol., 8: 177-199, redescribed the species. Achaval and Olmos, 2003, Anf. Rept. Uruguay, ed. 2: 27, provided a brief account and photograph for the Uruguay population. Fávero, Veiga-Menoncello, Rossa-Feres, Strüssmann, Giaretta, Andrade, Colombo, and Recco-Pimentel, 2011, Zool. Stud., Taipei, 50: 826-836, discussed karyology. See comments by Roberto, Cardozo, and Ávila, 2013, Zootaxa, 3636: 348–360. Alcalde and Barrasso, 2013, Amphibia-Reptilia, 34: 129-135, compared the internal larval anatomy of Pseudopaludicola boliviana and Pseudopaludicola falcipes. Langone, Lavilla, de Sá, and Cardozo, 2015, Zootaxa, 4058: 145–150, discussed the types, mapped the range, and addressed a number of misidentification in previous publications. 

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.