Fejervarya limnocharis (Gravenhorst, 1829)

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Dicroglossidae > Subfamily: Dicroglossinae > Genus: Fejervarya > Species: Fejervarya limnocharis

Rana limnocharis Gravenhorst, 1829, Delic. Mus. Zool. Vratislav., 1: 42. Type(s): Not stated, but formerly in the Breslau Museum (= MNHHWU?), now lost according to Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 27, who redescribed and nominated RMNH 4287 as neotype, this specimen being part of the original collection as the former types; this neotype designation confirmed by Veith, Kosuch, Ohler, and Dubois, 2001, Alytes, 19: 7. Type locality: not stated explicitly, but from context clearly Java, Indonesia. See Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 15-50, for nomenclatural discussion surrounding the authorship of this name.

Rana limnocharis Wiegmann, 1834, Nova Acta Phys. Med. Acad. Caesar Leopold Carol., Halle, 17: 225. Syntypes: ZMB (2 specimens), now lost, according to Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 28, and who designated RMNH 4287 neotype. Type locality: Not stated, but from context clearly Java, Indonesia. See Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 15-50, for nomenclatural discussion surround the authorship of this name and nomination of the neotype which is apparently part of the same collection as the original lost syntypes.

Rana lymnocharisStoliczka, 1872, Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1872: 102. Incorrect subsequent spelling.

Rana (Fejervarya) limnocharisBolkay, 1915, Anat. Anz., 48: 178. Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 148.

Rana wasl Annandale, 1917, Mem. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 6: 131. Holotype: ZSIC 17282 according to Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 33. Type locality: "Kuching, Sarawak", (Borneo) Indonesia. Synonymy by Van Kampen, 1923, Amph. Indo-Austral. Arch.: 167; Inger, 1966, Fieldiana, Zool., 52: 1-402; and Chanda, Das, and Dubois, 2001 "2000", Hamadryad, 25: 111, although Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 156, noted that because several species were covered under the binominal Rana limnocharis, that this name probably applied to one of the species in Borneo. Considered a synonym of Rana limnocharis Gravenhorst by Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 35.

Rana (Rana) limnocharisBoulenger, 1920, Rec. Indian Mus., 20: 6; Van Kampen, 1923, Amph. Indo-Austral. Arch.: 167.

Rana gracilisBourret, 1927, Fauna Indochine, Vert., 3: 264.

Rana limnocharis limnocharisMertens, 1930, Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 42: 214.

Dicroglossus limnocharisDeckert, 1938, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1938: 138.

Rana (Rana) limnocharisNakamura and Ueno, 1963, Japan. Rept. Amph. Color: 49. Presumably not based on true Fejervarya limnocharis (DRF).

Rana (Dicroglossus) limnocharis limnocharisDubois, 1974, Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris, Ser. 3, Zool., 213: 341-411.

Rana (Euphlyctis) limnocharisDubois, 1980 "1978", C. R. Séances Soc. Biogeogr., 55: 178.

Rana (Euphlyctis) limnocharisDubois, 1981, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Suppl., 15: 239, by implication.

Rana (Fejervarya) limnocharisDubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 148.

Euphlyctis limnocharisPoynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 27: 124, by implication; Fei, Ye, and Huang, 1990, Key to Chinese Amph.: 143-144.

Limnonectes (Fejervarya) limnocharisDubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 61.

Fejervarya limnocharisIskandar, 1998, Amph. Java Bali: 71, by implication; Fei, 1999, Atlas Amph. China: 182; Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 35.

Fejervarya waslFei, Ye, Jiang, and Xie, 2002, Herpetol. Sinica, 9: 92.

English Names

Indian Cricket Frog (Minton, 1966, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 134: 55).

Boie's Wart Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 100).

Grass Frog (Lim and Lim, 1992, Guide Amph. Rept. Singapore: 33; Iskandar, 1998, Amph. Java Bali: 72).

Field Frog (Lim and Lim, 1992, Guide Amph. Rept. Singapore: 33).

Rice Frog (Liu, 1931, Peking Nat. Hist. Bull., 5: 53; Li, Zhao, and Dong, 2010, Amph. Rept. Tibet: 47).

Paddy Frog (McKay, 2006, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Bali: 39).

Cricket Frog (Das and Dutta, 1998, Hamadryad, 23: 65; Daniels, 2005, Amph. Peninsular India: 207; Li, Zhao, and Dong, 2010, Amph. Rept. Tibet: 47).

Terrestrial Frog (Fei, 1999, Atlas Amph. China: 182).

White-lined Frog (Nutphund, 2001, Amph. Thailand: 112).

Rice Field Frog (Chan-ard, 2003, Photograph. Guide Amph. Thailand: 110; Lue, Tu, and Hsiang, 1999, Atlas Taiwan Amph. Rept.: 72, neither citation likely referring to true Fejervarya limnocharis [DRF]).

Paddyfield Frog (Daniels, 2005, Amph. Peninsular India: 207).

Distribution

Highly provisional, definitely known only from at Indonesia, Malaysia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand south of the Isthmus of Kra, Cambodia, and Vietnam north to (presumably artificially) to the Chinese border (but not recorded within that country). Reports from areas outside of this region almost assuredly apply to other species.

Comment

At one time or another almost all populations now considered to be members of Fejervarya were construed to be of this species. Nowadays, the name represents populations that have not been assigned to more well-delimited species and there is no evidence that the name covers any wide-ranging species, just a lot of populations of incertain relationship to each other or to other named populations. On the basis of molecular and morphological studies the populations seemingly strictly associated with the name Fejervarya limnocharis are in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia, and populations from India, Bangladesh, Japan and elsewhere associated with this name are currently unnamed species. Populations from China, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka, Japan, Philippines, and much of Indonesia are likely not conspecific with Fejervarya limnocharis although the synonymy of this nominal taxon does not currently reflect this. Nevertheless, the bulk of the literature for the inclusive grouping is mentioned here for want of an available species taxonomy (DRF). S.C. Anderson IN Frost, 1985, Amph. Species World: 500, regarded Afghanistan records as in error. Islam, Khan, Djong, Alam, and Sumida, 2008, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 25: 261-272, suggested on the basis of allozyme data that at least three species previously referred to Fejervarya "limnocharis" live in Bangladesh. Das, 2007, Amph. Rept. Brunei: 47, provided a photograph and brief account for Brunei. Reported for southwestern Cambodia by Ohler, Swan, and Daltry, 2002, Raffles Bull. Zool., 50: 465-481. Mohanty and Dutta, 1999, Russ. J. Herpetol., 6: 33-44, and Sarkar and Ray, 2006, In Alfred (ed.), Fauna of Arunachal Pradesh, Part 1: 299-300, discussed Indian populations but these are, for the most part, assignable to other species. Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 143-159, recognized populations of former Rana limnocharis from the Andaman Islands as Rana andamanensis, from the Philippines as Rana vittigera, and the Nilgiris region of southern India as Rana nilagirica; all of these are now recognized in the genus Fejervarya; see Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 61. Chanda, 2002, Handb. Indian Amph.: 122-125, provided a brief account (as Rana limnocharis) for the Indian population. Southeastern Asia distribution discussed by Bourret, 1942, Batr. Indochine: 249-255, although the assignment to Rana limnocharis is, of course, not helpful. See brief account and photo by Manthey and Grossmann, 1997, Amph. Rept. Südostasiens: 97-98, although the concept of the species at the time is strongly at variance with what it is currently. Daniels, 2005, Amph. Peninsular India: 207-210, provided an account for southerin India (as Limnonectes limnocharis). Borneo population reviewed by Inger, 1966, Fieldiana, Zool., 52: 205-206. Toda, Matsui, Nishida, and Ota, 1998, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 15: 607-613, reported on sympatric cryptic species under this name from Java and noted the strong possibility of additional cryptic species in Southeast Asia. Iskandar, 1998, Amph. Java Bali: 72-73, provided a brief account for the population of Java and Bali. Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 15-50, discussed the status of authorship and types. Veith, Kosuch, Ohler, and Dubois, 2001, Alytes, 19: 5-28, reported on morphological variation in the Greater Sunda Islands (see Fejervarya iskandari). Malkmus, Manthey, Vogel, Hoffmann, and Kosuch, 2002, Amph. Rept. Mount Kinabalu: 135-136, provided an account for Borneo. McKay, 2006, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Bali: 39, provided a brief account and photograph. See account by Berry, 1975, Amph. Fauna Peninsular Malaysia: 73-74. Khan, 2006, Amph. Rept. Pakistan: 58-59, provided an account for Pakistan populations that are no longer associated with Fejervarya limnocharis. Thailand: Taylor, 1962, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 43: 380-383. Nutphund, 2001, Amph. Thailand: 112, provided a brief characterization (as Rana limnocharis) and photograph. Chan-ard, 2003, Photograph. Guide Amph. Thailand: 110-111, provided a very brief account, map for Thailand, and photograph. Vietnam: Nguyen, Ho, and Nguyen, 2005, Checklist Amph. Rept. Vietnam: 148, provided a photograph. General: Sumida, Kotaki, Islam, Djong, Igawa, Kondo, Matsui, de Silva, Khonsue, and Nishioka, 2007, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 24: 547-562, provided evidence that the nominal "Fejervarya limnocharis" is composed of several species, including unnamed species from Sri Lanka, India, Taiwan, the Ryukyus, mainland Japan, and Thailand. Christy, Clark, Gee, Vice, Vice, Warner, Tyrrell, Rodda, and Savidge, 2007, Pacific Sci., 61: 469-483, reported specimens of Fejervarya cf. limnocharis from Guam but could not determine whether the species was established. See Dubois and Ohler, 2000, Alytes, 18: 45, for nomenclatural discussion. Hasan, Islam, Khan, Alam, Kurabayashi, Igawa, Kuramoto, and Sumida, 2012, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 29: 162-172, discussed the possibility of cryptic species in Bangladesh (their Fejervarya sp. medium type) and Myanmar, recognized on the basis of molecular evidence. Zug, 2013, Rept. Amph. Pacific Is.: 63–65, provided a brief account and photograph for the Guam population, noted as Fejervarya "limnocharis". Sumarli, Grismer, Anuar, Muin, and Quah, 2015, Check List, 11(4, Art. 1679): 8, reported specimens from Lata Belatan, West Malaysia, and and commented on its morphology. See account, photograph, and map for Vietnam in Vassilieva, Galoyan, Poyarkov, and Geissler, 2016, Photograph. Field Guide Amph. Rept. Lowland S. Vietnam: 88–89. Pham, An, Herbst, Bonkowski, Ziegler, and Nguyen, 2017, Bonn Zool. Bull., 66: 37–53, provided records for Cao Bang Province, Vietnam, along with observatons on morphology and natural history.  

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.