Plethodon hubrichti Thurow, 1957

Class: Amphibia > Order: Caudata > Family: Plethodontidae > Subfamily: Plethodontinae > Genus: Plethodon > Species: Plethodon hubrichti

Plethodon hubrichti Thurow, 1957, Herpetologica, 13: 59. Holotype: USNM 139087 (formerly GRT 1221), according to Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 20. Type locality: "by the Blue Ridge Parkway at about 3100 feet, 0.9 miles south of cement milepost 80 and a sign reading 'view of Black Rock Hill' in Bedford County near the Bedford–Botecourt line and roughly 10 miles ESE of Buchanan, Virginia", USA.

Plethodon richmondi hubrichtiConant, 1958, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am.: 232.

Plethodon nettingi hubrichtiThurow, 1968, Ser. Biol. Sci., W. Illinois Univ., 6: 16.

Plethodon hubrichtiHighton and Larson, 1979, Syst. Zool., 28: 587.

Plethodon (Plethodon) hubrichtiVieites, Román, Wake, and Wake, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 59: 632, by implication.

English Names

Thunder Ridge Salamander (Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 8).

Peaks of Otter Salamander (Conant, 1975, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am., Ed. 2: 275; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 33; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 8; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 27; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 14; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 29; Highton, Bonett, and Jockusch, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 31).

Distribution

Peaks of Otter region, Bedford, Botetourt, and Rockbridge counties, northeast of Roanoke, Virginia, USA, above 550 m elevation.

Comment

In the Plethodon cinereus group of Highton and Larson, 1979, Syst. Zool., 28: 579–599. See accounts by Highton, 1986, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 393 , and Petranka, 1998, Salamand. U.S. Canada: 363–365. Mitchell and Wicknick, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 814–815, provided a detailed account that summarized the biology and conservation literature. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 583. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 391_392, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. 

 

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.