Rhacophorus bipunctatus Ahl, 1927

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Rhacophoridae > Subfamily: Rhacophorinae > Genus: Rhacophorus > Species: Rhacophorus bipunctatus

Rhacophorus maculatus Anderson, 1871, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 40: 27. Syntypes: 5 specimens, presumably originally in ZSIC; reported as ZSIC 10291, 2753–6 by Bordoloi, Bortamuli, and Ohler, 2007, Zootaxa, 1653: 2 and specimens noted by Anderson as having been collected by Jerdon (Jerdon, 1870, Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1870: 66–85); these being BMNH 1872.4.17.123–129, according to Bordoloi, Bortamuli, and Ohler, 2007, Zootaxa, 1653: 3, who designat 1872. 4.17.127 designated lectotype (lectophoront). Type locality: "Khasi Hills", India.

Rhacophorus bimaculatus Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 90. Replacement name for Rhacophorus maculatus Anderson, 1871, a secondary homonym of Hyla maculata Gray, 1830, when the latter is in Rhacophorus.

Rhacophorus bipunctatus Ahl, 1927, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1927: 46. Replacement name for Rhacophorus bimaculatus Boulenger, 1882, a junior secondary homonym of Leptomantis bimaculata Peters, 1867 (now = Rhacophorus bimaculata).

Rhacophorus (Rhacophorus) bipunctatusAhl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 168; Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 77.

Rhacophorus reinwardtii bipunctatusWolf, 1936, Bull. Raffles Mus., 12: 214.

Rhacophorus bimaculatusInger, 1966, Fieldiana, Zool., 52: 294.

Rhacophorus bipunctatus — Inger, 1985, In Frost (ed.), Amph. Species World: 543.

Rhacophorus htunwini Wilkinson, Thin, Lwin, and Shein, 2005, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 56: 43. Holotype: CAS 229893, by original designation. Type locality: "Nagmung Township, Au Yin Ga Camp (27° 17′ 36.9″ N, 97° 51′ 45.3″ E), Putao District, Kachin State, Myanmar, elevation approximately 878 m". Synonymy by Bordoloi, Bortamuli, and Ohler, 2007, Zootaxa, 1653: 9.

English Names

Himalaya Flying Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 113; Li, Zhao, and Dong, 2010, Amph. Rept. Tibet: 61).

Twin-spotted Tree Frog (Das and Dutta, 1998, Hamadryad, 23: 67; Ahmed, Das, and Dutta, 2009, Amph. Rept. NE India: 50).

Double-spotted Treefrog (Fei, 1999, Atlas Amph. China: 268; Dinesh, Radhakrishnan, Gururaja, and Bhatta, 2009, Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Occas. Pap., 302: 117).

Orange-webbed Tree Frog (Nutphund, 2001, Amph. Thailand: 142).

Twin-spotted Bushfrog (Chan-ard, 2003, Photograph. Guide Amph. Thailand: 156).

Double-spotted Red-webbed Tree Frog (Mathew and Sen, 2010, Pict. Guide Amph. NE India: 109).

Htun Win's Treefrog (Rhacophorus htunwini [no longer recognized]; original publication).

Distribution

Eastern Himalayan region of northeastern India (Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, and Nagaland), adjacent northern Bangladesh, and eastern Xizang [= Tibet] (China) to Yunnan, Hunan, Hainan, and Guangxi, China, and Laos and Vietnam in the Annam Mountains and the Tay-Nguyen Plateau; Cardomom Mountains of southwestern Cambodia; Karin Hills of Myanmar; northern peninsular, western and eastern Thailand (see comment).

Comment

In the Rhacophorus (Rhacophorus) reinwardtii group of Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 77 (see comment under Rhacophorus for dissenting opinion). Fei, 1999, Atlas Amph. China: 268–269, provided a brief account, map, and figure. Chanda, 2002, Handb. Indian Amph.: 203, provided a brief account. See brief account and photo by Manthey and Grossmann, 1997, Amph. Rept. Südostasiens: 132–133. Reported for southwestern Cambodia by Ohler, Swan, and Daltry, 2002, Raffles Bull. Zool., 50: 465–481. Chan-ard, 2003, Photograph. Guide Amph. Thailand: 156–157, provided a very brief account, map for Thailand, and photograph. Nguyen, Ho, and Nguyen, 2005, Checklist Amph. Rept. Vietnam: 39, provided specific localities for Vietnam and (p. 150) a photograph. Reported for Pulau Langkawi, Kadeh, northwestern West Malaysia, by Grismer, Youmans, Wood, Ponce, Wright, Jones, Johnson, Sanders, Gower, Yaakob, and Lim, 2006, Hamadryad, 30: 61–74. Stuart, 2005, Herpetol. Rev., 36: 478, provided a record for Sayaboury Province, Laos. Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 98, provided systematic notes, access to literature, and range. Ao, Bordoloi, and Ohler, 2003, Zoos' Print J., 18: 1117–1125, provided a specific locality for Nagaland, northeastern India. Stuart and Emmett, 2006, Fieldiana, Zool., N.S., 109: 11, provided records for the Cadamom Mountains, southwestern Cambodia. Bain, Nguyen, and Doan, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 111, provided records for Thua Thien-Hue and Lao Cai provinces, Vietnam, and briefly discussed the range. Devi and Shamungou, 2006, J. Exp. Zool. India, 9: 317–324, provided a record for Manipur, northeastern India. Chakma, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 478, provided a record of nominal Rhacophorus htunwini from Bangladesh. Nguyen, Tran, Nguyen, and Pham, 2008, Herpetol. Rev., 39: 364, suggested that all records of Rhacophorus bipunctatus actually refer to Rhacophorus rhodopus. Fei, Hu, Ye, and Huang, 2009, Fauna Sinica, Amph. 2: 769-771, provided an account and a spot map for China and assigned this species to their Rhacophorus verrucopus group. Ahmed, Das, and Dutta, 2009, Amph. Rept. NE India: 50, provided a brief account for northeastern India. Reza and Mukul, 2009, Herpetol. Rev., 40: 447, provided a record for Bangladesh and commented on the range. Mathew and Sen, 2010, Pict. Guide Amph. NE India: 109–111, provided brief characterizations and photographs as both Rhacophorus bipunctatus and Rhacophorus htunwini. Fei, Ye, and Jiang, 2010, Colored Atlas of Chinese Amph.: 451, provided a brief account for China including photographs of specimens. Li, Zhao, and Dong, 2010, Amph. Rept. Tibet: 61–61, provided an account for Xizang, China. Fei, Ye, and Jiang, 2012, Colored Atlas Chinese Amph. Distr.: 533, provided an account, photographs, and a range map. Chan, Grismer, and Brown, 2018, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 127: 1010–1019, suggested, albeit tentatively, on the basis of molecular evidence, that the peninsular Malaysia populations of Rhacophorus bipunctatus are actually Rhacophorus rhodopus, although the seeming allopatry of the nominal populations is confusing, suggesting that dense sampling is needed in the intervening geography within the range of the complex.  

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.