Amphibian Species of the World 5.6, an Online Reference

Cranopsis fastidiosus Cope, 1875 "1876", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 8: 96. Syntypes: USNM 32584-87; USNM 32585 designated lectotype by Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 39 (and neotype of Ollotis coerulescens by Savage, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 25). Type locality: "2500 feet elevation on the slope of the Pico Blanco [, Cantón de Talamanca, Provincia Limón], in the district of Uren", Costa Rica. Savage, 1974, Rev. Biol. Tropical, 22: 110, commented on the type locality.

Ollotis coerulescens Cope, 1875 "1876", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 8: 98. Types: USNM, not located. Type locality: "from 3000 to 5000 feet elevation on Pico Blanco" = Cerro Kamuk (Pico Blanco)[actually Cerro Utyum], probably between the Rio Uren and Rio Lari at 760 m, Talamanca region of southeastern Costa Rica. Synonymy, discussion of type, and type locality by Savage, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 25. Savage, 1974, Rev. Biol. Tropical, 22: 110, commented on the type locality and gave it as "Cerro Utyum, between 3000 and 5000 ft, Cantón de Talamanca, Provinca de Limon; 914-1524 m", Costa Rica.

Bufo caerulescens — Brocchi, 1882, Miss. Scient. Mex. Amer. Centr., Rech. Zool., 3(2, livr. 2): 83. Incorrect subsequent spelling of species name.

Bufo fastidiosus — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 326. Brocchi, 1882, Miss. Scient. Mex. Amer. Centr., Rech. Zool., 3(2, livr. 2): 83.

Cranophryne fastidiosa — Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 260. By implication.

Nannophryne coerulescens — Cope, 1890 "1889", Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 12: 142. Günther, 1901, Biol. Centr. Amer., Rept. Batr., Part 164: 257.

Nannophryne fastidiosa — Günther, 1901, Biol. Centr. Amer., Rept. Batr., Part 164: 257.

Bufo coerulescens — Nieden, 1923, Das Tierreich, 46: 135.

Cranopsis fastidiosa — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 364.

Ollotis fastidiosa — Frost, Grant, and Mendelson, 2006, Copeia, 2006: 558. by implication.

Incilius fastidiosus — Frost, Mendelson, and Pramuk, 2009, Copeia, 2009: 418-419.

English Names

Pico Blanco Toad (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 41).

Distribution

Atlantic slopes of the Cordillera de Talamanca--Chiriquí of southeastern Costa Rica and adjacent western Panama, 760-2100 m elevation.

Comment

Savage, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 25, grouped this species, together with Bufo holdridgei and Bufo peripatetes in an assemblage related to the lowland Bufo valliceps group; subsequently Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 195, named this group the Bufo fastidiosus group and provided an account for this species. Graybeal and de Queiroz, 1992, J. Herpetol., 26: 84-87, supplied behavioral data to support the monophyly of this group plus Osornophryne, although this is incongruent with subsequently published evidence. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status (as Bufo cristatus) in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 183. Mendelson, Mulcahy, Williams, and Sites, 2011, Zootaxa, 3138: 1-34, suggested that this species is a member of a monophyletic Incilius coniferus group that includes Incilius coniferus, Incilius chompipe, Incilius epioticus, Incilius fastidiosus, Incilius guanacastes, Incilius holdridgei, Incilius karenlipsae, Incilius periglenes, and Incilius peripatetes.

External Links

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.

• For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
• For images search Arkive, CalPhoto Images and Google Images
• To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
• For information aggregation from other sites and some original accounts see AmphibiaWeb report
• For further information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
• For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist;
• for a quick link to their maps see iNaturalist KML