American Museum of Natural History

Amphibian Species of the World 5.6, an Online Reference

  • ASW home
  • herpetology site

Amietophrynus poweri (Hewitt, 1935)

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Bufonidae > Genus: Amietophrynus

[link to this account]

Bufo regularis poweri Hewitt, 1935, Rec. Albany Mus., 4: 293. Syntypes: AMG (5 specimens), by original designation; now in PEM. Type locality: "Kimberley", Free State, Rep. South Africa.

Bufo poweri — Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 78.

Amietophrynus poweri — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 363.

English Names

Common Lowveld Toad (Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 78).

Kimberley Toad (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 43).

Power's Toad (Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 90).

Western Olive Toad (Du Preez, Cunningham, and Turner, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 76; Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 152).

Distribution

Northern half of Namibia, extreme southern Angola, extreme southern Zambia, and northern, eastern, and southeastern Botswana southward to central Rep. South Africa (see comment).

Comment

In the Bufo regularis group of Tandy and Keith, 1972, in Blair (ed.), Evol. Genus Bufo: 159. Without comment, considered a synonym of Bufo garmani by Gorham, 1974, Checklist World Amph.: 80, and Tandy and Keith, 1972, in Blair (ed.), Evol. Genus Bufo: 159, and Lambiris, 1988, Lammergeyer, 39: 51-52. Poynton and Broadley, 1988, Ann. Natal Mus., 29: 457, noted that Bufo poweri and Bufo pseudogarmani might be conspecific (while retaining Bufo pseudogarmani in the synonymy of Bufo garmani). Maintains small, but consistent call differences from Bufo garmani according to Channing, 1991, S. Afr. J. Zool., 26: 81-84. Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 91, Du Preez, Cunningham, and Turner, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 76-77, and Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 521-525, provided accounts, and considered all populations of nominal Bufo garmani from Zimbabwe, Zambia, Malawi, and Mozambique to be Bufo poweri. Broadley, 2007, Afr. J. Herpetol., 56: 175-177, regarded the situation as more complex, with the population in the Kalahari sands in Hwange National Park and at Dete to be Amietophrynus poweri, but populations to the east to not be Amietophrynus poweri (all as Bufo).

External Links

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.

  • For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
  • For images search Arkive, CalPhoto Images and Google Images
  • To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
  • For information aggregation from other sites and some original accounts see AmphibiaWeb report
  • For further information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
  • For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist;
  • for a quick link to their maps see iNaturalist KML
  • How to cite
  • How to use
  • Higher taxonomy and progress
  • Structure of records
  • History of the project
  • Contributors, 1985 edition
  • Contributors, online edition
  • Versions
  • Museum abbreviations
  • Useful links
  • Copyright and terms of use

Copyright © 1998-2013, Darrel Frost and The American Museum of Natural History. All Rights Reserved.

Send inquiries to Darrel Frost <frost at amnh org>.