Leptodactylus discodactylus Boulenger, 1884 "1883", Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1883: 637. Holotype: BMNH 1947.2.17.40 (formerly 84.2.18.44), by museum records, according to W.R. Heyer (personal commun.). Type locality: "Yurimaguas, Huallaga River, [Loreto,] Northern Peru".
Leptodactylus nigrescens Andersson, 1945, Ark. Zool., 37A(2): 57-58. Syntypes: NHRM (3 specimens) by original indication; NHRM unnumbered (largest of syntypes) designated lectotype by Heyer, 1970, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 191: 7. Type locality: "Rio Napo, Watershed, 400 m", Ecuador. Synonymy by Gorham, 1966, Das Tierreich, 85: 132; Heyer, 1970, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 191: 7.
Vanzolinius discodactylus — Heyer, 1974, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 87: 88.
Leptodactylus discodactylus — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 362.
Vanzolini's Amazon Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 85).
Amazonian Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador; state of Amazonas, Brazil; likely into adjacent Amazonian Colombia.
See account (as Leptodactylus discodactylus) by Heyer, 1970, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 191: 7-9. See also Gascon, Lougheed, and Bogart, 1996, Biotropica, 28: 376-387, for discussion of apparent lack of geographic variation. This followed by Heyer, 1997, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 110: 338-365, who discussed goegraphic variation in color pattern, morphology, and call structure. Most closely related to Adenomera and Lithodytes, according to Heyer, 1975, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 199. Heyer, 1998, Alytes, 16: 1-24, presented evidence to place Vanzolinius deeply within a paraphyletic Leptodactylus, and likely the sister taxon of Leptodactylus diedrus. Köhler and Lötters, 1999, Bonn. Zool. Beitr., 48: 259-273, provided the Bolivian record.
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.