| The Ants of Africa SUBFAMILY PONERINAE - Genus Asphinctopone |
|
| Contents - Ponerinae - PONERINAE Introduction |
Genus Asphinctopone Santschi (1914d: 318)In Tribe PONERINI. Diagnostic Features - Mandibles somewhat elongated, armed
with five teeth, the basal internal margin with a distinct notch.
Clypeus bluntly carinate, with the median portion projecting as a
rectangular lobe. Eyes reduced. Frontal lobes present. Dorsum of
alitrunk with promesonotal suture and metanotal groove distinct, the
latter very deeply impressed. Declivity of propodeum steep, marginate
on sides and top. Petiole a high, narrow scale, unarmed but the
posterior peduncle with a number of distinct raised transverse ridges
(Bernard, 1952, gave this ridging as distinct to lamottei,
hence his separation as Lepidopone (synonymised, however, by
Brown, 1953h). Subpetiolar process complex, with three prominences.
Gaster without a constriction, but with a large anteroventral process
on the first segment (Santschi, 1914d: 318). Santschi's (1914d) genus
description is at
|
||||||||||||
Bolton (1973a) gave it as a monotypic genus, the species being Asphinctopone silvestrii Santschi; and mentions finding specimens from a black-rotten, very wet banana trunk near Ibadan. However, Bolton had not sighted the work of Bernard at that time, and a picture of another species, Asphinctopone lucidus from Zaïre is shown by Hölldobler & Wilson, (1990, page 83). They listed it as a valid genus but use of the key (by Bolton) in their book ends with "33. Pachycondyla (in part)" and Asphinctopone is not reached. It is listed, however, by Bolton (1994, 1995). Asphinctopone lucidus Weber (1949) is known from the Central African Republic. Bernard (1952) noted it as being more like lamottei, but with a simple petiole and the scape surpassing the vertex. |
||||||||||||
Species known from Africa - historical separations
|
||||||||||||
Bolton & Fisher (2008) http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2008/f/zt01827p061.pdf) have reviewed the genus, examining the types of lamottei and lucidus, but not of silvestrii which appears to be lost. They synonymized those three under silvestrii and added a new species Asphinctopone differens [page held in abeyance] with a single holotype specimen separable from silvestrii by having "the propodeum in profile with a pelt of erect, weakly curved pubescence. Side of propodeum entirely densely irregularly sculptured". It has to be said that their arguments for the synonymization of the three older species, whilst apparently strong, tend to diminish the reported differences, e.g. in the propodeum profile, scape length, etc, and ignore the disparities in the full face drawings of the head. They then offer limited, and, from their photographs, certainly not strongly obvious differences to justify the delineation of differens. The range of photographs on http://www.antweb.org/description.do?rank=species&name=silvestrii&genus=asphinctopone&project=, indeed shows quite a lot of variation between specimens all labelled silvestrii. |
| PONERINAE Introduction | © 2007, 2008 - Brian Taylor CBiol
FIBiol FRES 11, Grazingfield, Wilford, Nottingham, NG11 7FN, U.K. |
href="asphinctopone.htm"